Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uploading. It built fine with gcc-4.1 and -O2. Excellent. I've removed the -O0 hack from my local copy so that will be off in the next upload, whenever that is. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Uploading. It built fine with gcc-4.1 and -O2. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists > on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. > > I'm willing to do a binNMU if that would be helpful. I was going to upload 3.4.1a-2 today, but there is an issue with the patch, so I'm

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:51:54PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Right now, I have a special case in debian/rules for m68k that turns > off optimization (specifically, replaces -O2 with -O0 in CFLAGS). Do > you think I should leave that hack in or take it out? I'm planning on > taking it out, b

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Right now, I have a special case in debian/rules for m68k that turns off optimization (specifically, replaces -O2 with -O0 in CFLAGS). Do you think I should leave that hack in or take it out? I'm planning on taking it out, but I would probably put it back if the build fails. I could test it mys

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:34:44AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists > > on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. > > > > I'm willing to do a binNMU if that would be helpful. > > This is very good news. Thanks for letting me kno

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists > on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. > > I'm willing to do a binNMU if that would be helpful. This is very good news. Thanks for letting me know. Is gcc-4.1 on the m68k buildds now? I'm planning on doing another icu upl

Bug#360743: [m68k] icu builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: icu Version: 3.4.1a-1 Severity: important The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. I'm willing to do a binNMU if that would be helpful.