On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:28:50PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Indeed. AFAICS that is because the symlink is not part of the x11-common
> package and is created on-the-fly. Another reason why the current
> solution sucks.
Ok, that's fair. Here's what I'll try to implement over the next few days
(
#include
* Vincent Lefevre [Mon, May 15 2006, 11:33:35AM]:
> On 2006-05-15 09:06:33 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > - present a list to the user, saying what the remaining files are and
> >where they do come from (package names to be easily removed by $user)
>
> The user can remove these pack
On 2006-05-15 09:06:33 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> - present a list to the user, saying what the remaining files are and
>where they do come from (package names to be easily removed by $user)
The user can remove these packages. But this is not sufficient,
as the user could re-add them later.
reopen 362885
thanks
#include
> > BTW, I'm reopening this bug: Making a symlink is bogus since
> > dpkg removes it when one removes a package that contains files
> > in /usr/X11R6/bin. Otherwise, x11-common should make sure that
> > the symlink remains (if possible).
>
> We've found a good so
4 matches
Mail list logo
