Bug#363108: Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

On Saturday 05 August 2006 05:28, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to > > clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. > > > > Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to > > match exactly th

Bug#363108: Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

Hi, > I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to > clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. > > Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to > match exactly the upstream project name. In this case the upstream > name is "vcf

Bug#363108: Do we really need the laspa- prefix?

Hi all, I'd like to sponsor the upload this package, but before I need to clear the naming convention of ladspa related packages. Generally speaking I think that Debian packages names should try to match exactly the upstream project name. In this case the upstream name is "vcf", which