[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As you know, libmotif-dev is not sid installable because it conflicts
> with conflicts with x11-common.
Yep.
> You said (Wed, 14 Jun 2006) you have a way to fix that bug.
Well, there is a patch in the BTS.
> I really would enjoy to see the fix in debian.
Same here.
Regarding your offer to NMU the libmotif-dev package,
please do! I have a keen interest in this and am now stuck
being unable to provide software updates for some Motif based
software I maintain. 2.5 months is enough time to wait for a
fix from the maintainer. BTW, the Motif packages in
Ubuntu Da
> > As you know, libmotif-dev is not sid installable because it conflicts
> > with conflicts with x11-common.
>
> Yep.
>
> > You said (Wed, 14 Jun 2006) you have a way to fix that bug.
>
> Well, there is a patch in the BTS.
>
> > I really would enjoy to see the fix in debian.
>
> Same here.
>
> >
Package: libmotif-dev
Version: 2.2.3-1.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
x11-common conflicts with libmotif-dev which makes it uninstallable
after the modular xorg update.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, '
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:56:15AM -0700, Kris Jurka wrote:
> Package: libmotif-dev
> Version: 2.2.3-1.3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> x11-common conflicts with libmotif-dev which makes it uninstallable
> after the modular xorg update.
This is because libmotif-dev
Steve Langasek wrote:
More generally, openmotif needs to be updated to use /usr instead of
/usr/X11R6; this was already a bug because openmotif does not appear to use
imake, and /usr/X11R6 is reserved for packages that are either part of X11R6
or build using imake.
Is that as simple to do as
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 05:21:56PM -0700, Kris Jurka wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >More generally, openmotif needs to be updated to use /usr instead of
> >/usr/X11R6; this was already a bug because openmotif does not appear to use
> >imake, and /usr/X11R6 is reserved for packages that are eith
Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, a fixed libxp-dev that installs to /usr/lib,/usr/include is waiting in
the NEW queue.
Now that that's gone in, here's a new patch.
/usr/man isn't the right directory, this should be /usr/share/man on an
FHS-compliant system. But these lines seem to be commented o
8 matches
Mail list logo
