On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:18:33AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I spent some time trying to fix this a while ago at Jeff Bailey's
> > request, but it required nasty invasive changes that I didn't have
> > time to debug. (It's not really an improvement when /sbin/init fails
> > to exec...)
>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:19:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: linux32
> > Version: 1-3
> >
> > $ uname -m
> > parisc64
> >
> > $ linux32 uname -m
> > parisc64
> >
>
> I spent some time trying to fix this a while ago
reassign 364562 linux-2.6
thanks
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:11:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: linux32
> > > Version: 1-3
> > >
> > > $ uname -m
> > > parisc64
> > >
> > > $ linux32 uname -
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: linux32
> > Version: 1-3
> >
> > $ uname -m
> > parisc64
> >
> > $ linux32 uname -m
> > parisc64
>
> I believe that that is a kernel bug in that case. It checks the
> return value of personality(2
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: linux32
> Version: 1-3
>
> $ uname -m
> parisc64
>
> $ linux32 uname -m
> parisc64
I believe that that is a kernel bug in that case. It checks the
return value of personality(2), and that seems to have been
succesful. C
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: linux32
> Version: 1-3
>
> $ uname -m
> parisc64
>
> $ linux32 uname -m
> parisc64
>
I spent some time trying to fix this a while ago at Jeff Bailey's
request, but it required nasty invasive changes that I didn't have
tim
Package: linux32
Version: 1-3
$ uname -m
parisc64
$ linux32 uname -m
parisc64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo