On 06-May-02 20:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Adding the extra files under installer/build is no real issue. Any changes
> in tools or the Makefile needed?
Adding the extra ppc64 specific files should be sufficient.
> > I had to set up the network m
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:09:00AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06-May-01 19:23, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that once we are going multi-arch (probably not for etch though),
> > > the
> > > 64bit architectur
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > Please provide the full picture. We may re-evaluate after that.
> >
> > Notice that once we are g
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:01:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > The 'debian-installer' patch which I am currently using to build and
> > test d-i on ppc64 is 96 lines long. It basically reuses the config
> > files from the existing powerpc/power
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:49:07AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> > > to the architecture line in debian/contr
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> The 'debian-installer' patch which I am currently using to build and
> test d-i on ppc64 is 96 lines long. It basically reuses the config
> files from the existing powerpc/powerpc64 case by directly including
> them.
Adding the extra files un
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> > to the architecture line in debian/control as 'wontfix'.
>
> How many other patches will be needed to get the l
Hello,
On 06-May-01 19:23, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Notice that once we are going multi-arch (probably not for etch though), the
> > 64bit architecture will be called powerpc64, and not ppc64. The ppc64 effort
> > is a different thing
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Please provide the full picture. We may re-evaluate after that.
>
> Notice that once we are going multi-arch (probably not for etch though), the
> 64bit architecture wil
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> > to the architecture line in debian/control as 'wontfix'.
>
> How many other patches will be needed to get the l
Hello Frans,
thank you for your reply to my call for help! I know that you
have a lot of serious work to do for the release architectures.
So thanks again for taking the time to look at the comparatively
unimportant ppc64 case.
On 06-May-01 03:52, Frans Pop wrote:
> How many other patches will be
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> to the architecture line in debian/control as 'wontfix'.
How many other patches will be needed to get the level of ppc64 support
you are aiming for?
If the current set is all,
On 06-Apr-29 20:51, Frans Pop wrote:
> tags 365203 - pending
> tags 365203 + wontfix
> tags 365345 + wontfix
> tags 339716 + wontfix
> tags 354947 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> I'm very sorry, but after discussing this during the d-i development
> meeting and consulting with Release Management, we feel
tags 365203 - pending
tags 365203 + wontfix
tags 365345 + wontfix
tags 339716 + wontfix
tags 354947 + wontfix
thanks
I'm very sorry, but after discussing this during the d-i development
meeting and consulting with Release Management, we feel that the ppc64
port ever reaching the archives is curr
Package: rootskel
Version: 1.31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
the following patch creates the /lib64 symlink
which is currently created on the amd64 architecture
also on ppc64.
The /lib64 symlink is necessary to make the installer
images work on ppc64 because the dynamic linker has
to b
15 matches
Mail list logo
