On 28/07/09 at 14:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:56:20PM +0200, John Wright wrote:
> > Since we build so much of the kernel as modules, I think it's much
> > better if we can provide debug info for modules as well.
>
> We need a proper space expectation for the resulti
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:56:20PM +0200, John Wright wrote:
> Since we build so much of the kernel as modules, I think it's much
> better if we can provide debug info for modules as well.
We need a proper space expectation for the resulting packages. My
current one shows about 300MiB per flavour
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:28:46PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I did some checks on the intermediate space requirements, especially the
> build directory and ccache dirs. The ability to use ccache is currently
> the limiting factor to do the snapshots in the current fashion. All
> c
On 17/07/09 at 14:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [1]: Even this would currently make it impossible to build snapshots in
> the current setup, because the used machine have no additional free
> space.
Hi Bastian,
The kernel snapshots is a really useful service (which unfortunately
isn't very wel
Hi folks
I did some checks on the intermediate space requirements, especially the
build directory and ccache dirs. The ability to use ccache is currently
the limiting factor to do the snapshots in the current fashion. All
checks are done with the default powerpc64 image.
No debugging info:
- buil
5 matches
Mail list logo
