On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:06:11PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Compiling the file in question (mods.c) with -O0 makes the problem go away.
> > Likewise, compiling it with gcc-4.1 (with -O2) makes the problem go away.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Compiling the file in question (mods.c) with -O0 makes the problem go away.
> Likewise, compiling it with gcc-4.1 (with -O2) makes the problem go away. I'm
> unable to point at anything directly wrong in the code, but I'm not f
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:36:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Since this is a bug with OpenLDAP
> Is that certain? It looks just as likely to be a compiler bug to me.
After testing some more, it seems fairly likely to be a compiler bug.
Compiling the file in question (mods.c) with -O0 makes
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:57:20PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> If it isn't an OpenLDAP thing, then I guess no ITS. ;) I thought it wasn't
> completely specific to the ARM platform.
I haven't seen anybody being able to reproduce it except on arm, and
certainly such brokenness should be de
--On Sunday, June 04, 2006 7:36 PM -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theo
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> >>OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theory that
> >>it's some kind of overflow issue. I'm starting a build with -O2 now --
> >>pe
--On Monday, June 05, 2006 1:58 AM +0200 "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theory that
it's some kind of overflow issue. I'm starting a build with
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theory that it's
> some kind of overflow issue. I'm starting a build with -O2 now -- perhaps it
> can be caught using valgrind on a slightly faster platform, though...
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:19:44PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm currently compiling a noopt/nostrip-version, but at 133MHz ARM it's going
> to take a while.
OK, the problem doesn't show up at -O0, which supports the theory that it's
some kind of overflow issue. I'm starting a build wit
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:17:51PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Is it possible to reproduce in 2.3.24? Or just the rather old 2.2.x
> version?
2.3.24.
I'm currently compiling a noopt/nostrip-version, but at 133MHz ARM it's going
to take a while.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.se
--On Sunday, June 04, 2006 9:15 PM +0200 "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:43:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I'm completely unable to reproduce this.
Scrap that; I can reproduce it now. I just didn't see that slapd
segfaulted... Debuggin
11 matches
Mail list logo
