On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:21:46AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=Norbert Preining date=Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:20:12AM +0200
One idea would be to put the package as Kohda-san prepared it into svn
and we try to care all together for this...
This sounds like the best idea to me as
Hi all!
On Mit, 30 Aug 2006, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
I think that the best idea is to the put the packages as they exist into
SVN and then work them from there. I can merge the (small amount of)
Ok, I have done it. package names xetex and xdvipdfmx
NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE
I have
quote who=Ralf Stubner date=Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:19:32PM +0200
some time ago you have changed this RFP into an ITP. Recently there have
been some discussions on debian-tex-maint concerning XeTeX and
xdvipdfmx, most of which are archived in bug #365672. Before going any
further, we would
quote who=Norbert Preining date=Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:20:12AM +0200
One idea would be to put the package as Kohda-san prepared it into svn
and we try to care all together for this...
This sounds like the best idea to me as well.
Regarsd,
Mako
--
Benjamin Mako Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 00:26 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
XeTeX extends the TeX typesetting system (and macro packages such as
LaTeX and ConTeXt) to have native support for the Unicode character set,
including complex Asian scripts, and for
Dear Kohda-san!
Good to hear from you. How was the summer in Japan? If it was as hot as
the July in Europe it must have been very bad, together with the
humitity!
Some comment to xetex:
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
From curiosity, I've packaged xetex 0.995 (and xdvipdfmx 0.3) for
Dear Kohda-san!
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
but it has been very hot even this week...
Rain here, heavy rain ...
Next version will include it. I think about making a intermediate
release of texlive packages with 2006~svnYYMMDD so that we can get
xetex. We will see.
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:45:36 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear Kohda-san!
Hi Norbert,
Good to hear from you. How was the summer in Japan? If it was as hot as
the July in Europe it must have been very bad, together with the
humitity!
Well, I've tried to think it was as bad as normal
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
From curiosity, I've packaged xetex 0.995 (and xdvipdfmx 0.3) for
Debian/unstable. (I don't mean to maintain it though. I guess
it would be best TeXLive includes XeTeX.)
Next version will include it. I
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:47:55 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear Kohda-san!
Hi Norbert,
Ah, perhaps I modified postinst in a wrong way. Thanks.
Hmm why the postinst? The link should be created in the rules files I
suppose. It should be shipped with the data.tar.gz. dh_installtex does
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, perhaps I modified postinst in a wrong way. Thanks.
Hmm why the postinst? The link should be created in the rules files I
suppose. It should be shipped with the data.tar.gz. dh_installtex does
*NOT* create the necessary symlinks. (Should it do
Hi all!
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
suppose. It should be shipped with the data.tar.gz. dh_installtex does
*NOT* create the necessary symlinks. (Should it do it?)
If we want to do that, we should modify texlinks to accept a $DESTDIR
and call that one from dh_installtex.
On
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Next version will include it. I think about making a intermediate
release of texlive packages with 2006~svnYYMMDD so that we can get
xetex. We will see.
While that would be good, I think it would be even better if someone
maintains a separate
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:20 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
While that would be good, I think it would be even better if someone
maintains a separate xetex package. xetex has a much faster development
process currently than texlive.
ACK
Hi all!
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
True, absolutely true. The only question is who? I have not enough
knowledge on xetex etc to do this. And not enough time.
First of all #365672 has been changed from an RFP to an ITP some time
ago. I can't remember right now who did this,
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
suppose. It should be shipped with the data.tar.gz. dh_installtex does
*NOT* create the necessary symlinks. (Should it do it?)
If we want to do that, we should modify texlinks to accept a $DESTDIR
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:06:48 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Besides XeTeX one also needs xdvipdfmx (also an ITP). Here the
relationship with the existing dvipdfmx packages are non trivial. At
least when build with upstream's Debian packaging the two packages have
to conflict since they contain
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:21:31 +0900 (JST), I wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:43:17 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Current SVN is better. ;-)
I see, I'll try it later.
From curiosity, I've packaged xetex 0.995 (and xdvipdfmx 0.3) for
Debian/unstable. (I don't mean to maintain it though. I
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2006 19:40:10 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
now. Also, there are some interesting questions concerning the proper
placement of XeTeX specific files in the TEXMF tree.
I've installed xetex 0.944a in my Debian/unstable (with TeXlive,
I rebuilt xetex so that
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:43:17 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Current SVN is better. ;-)
I see, I'll try it later.
* there are some duplicated files in XeTeX and TeXliv/teTeX,
for example, keyval.sty, xkeyval.sty are such files.
* under the above settings (and the current xetex package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
XeTeX extends the TeX typesetting system (and macro packages such as
LaTeX and ConTeXt) to have native support for the Unicode character set,
including complex Asian scripts, and for OpenType and TrueType
21 matches
Mail list logo
