tags 368251 pending
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
And, yes, adding a warning that large sites may have performance
issues with these settings would be good.
Oh, ok. Yes, no objections.
The point then becomes: should we close #38625 with that fix ?
I
Problem: we currently have no etch branch..:)
Of course we have one. My SVN copy was just outdated..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:47:13AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Do we understand why these are no longer the built-in defaults upstream?
If I were to guess I think maybe for performance reasons at large sites.
Seems to me that this is what I heard once in Jerry Carter's mouth, yes.
That
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:57:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:47:13AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Do we understand why these are no longer the built-in defaults
upstream?
If I were to guess I think maybe for performance reasons at large
sites.
That sounds like a good reason to me, and doesn't seem like something
we should override in the Debian package?
Perhaps add the options commented out and with a warning that large
sites may get a performance hit?
My proposal was inded to add these option as part of the *currently
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:05:19PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
That sounds like a good reason to me, and doesn't seem like something
we should override in the Debian package?
Perhaps add the options commented out and with a warning that large
sites may get a performance hit?
My
And, yes, adding a warning that large sites may have performance
issues with these settings would be good.
Oh, ok. Yes, no objections.
The point then becomes: should we close #38625 with that fix ?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:23:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
As a winbind user, I think that these should be interesting defaults
to add to the default smb.conf, yes.
We can't do anything for existing configurations. Adding options to an
existing smb.conf (during an upgrade) is really
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:23:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
As a winbind user, I think that these should be interesting defaults
to add to the default smb.conf, yes.
We can't do anything for existing configurations. Adding options to an
existing smb.conf (during
Do we understand why these are no longer the built-in defaults upstream?
If I were to guess I think maybe for performance reasons at large sites.
Seems to me that this is what I heard once in Jerry Carter's mouth, yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
10 matches
Mail list logo
