I've temporarily reworded the partman-auto template to not claim that
actions can be undone, but it would be nice if p-a-l could be fixed to
act like the rest of partman and confirm before touching disk. If that
change is made, the partman-auto template can be reverted to the old
wording.
In the
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:04 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:37:18PM -0700, ERIIX M. Blaike wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:54 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Please tell us more about what you did.
snip/
2: In the guided partitioning, choose Erase entire disk and
# _That_ is the problem -- it specifically says the operation can be
# undone when it cannot. The massage there was created before LVM was
# included as a guided partitioning option and has not been changed to
# reflect the new reality -- the inability to undo the partitioning if
# you do not
The text in question is this:
This installer can guide you through partitioning a disk for use by
Debian, or if you prefer, you can do it manually. If you do choose to
use the guided partitioning tool, you will still have a chance later to
see the results, customise it, and even undo the
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:39:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
it's easy to see how this would be confusing. I think the best thing would
be for partman-auto-lvm to display the partman-lvm/confirm message before
touching the disk here.
That's much better than my suggestion since it doesn't require
Package: partman
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I burned a D-I image for a friend (the latest weekly Debian CD as of Mar
12 15:12) and chose to play with it a bit to see if it was clearly
broken in some obvious way or likely okay for out purposes.
Once I had verified
Tags 368633 moreinfo
Stop
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:14:55AM -0700, Eric Monson wrote:
Package: partman
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I burned a D-I image for a friend (the latest weekly Debian CD as of Mar
Please confirm that you mean 'MaY' (and not 'MaRch')
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:54 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Please confirm that you mean 'MaY' (and not 'MaRch')
Sorry. Timestamp from the wrong iso. May 14 16:24 is the timestamp
from the one in question.
Please tell us more about what you did.
I played around some in the disc, but the
8 matches
Mail list logo
