Hi,
On Saturday 05 April 2008 21:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think the approach being proposed is wrong. It would upset existing
users and make life more complicated for normal uses, to accomodate what
is essentially a packaging and policy problem. There could be any number
of custom
Hi Kurt, Peter Bdale,
could you please comment on the status of this bug? It's really important for
us to fix #311188 for Lenny, so that upgrades from Lenny to Lenny+1 will work
without problems for Debian Edu installations.
It seemed that you just needed to change a few bits in the packaging
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 08:32:05PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Kurt, Peter Bdale,
could you please comment on the status of this bug? It's really important for
us to fix #311188 for Lenny, so that upgrades from Lenny to Lenny+1 will work
without problems for Debian Edu installations.
Holger Levsen wrote:
could you please comment on the status of this bug? It's really important
for us to fix #311188 for Lenny, so that upgrades from Lenny to Lenny+1
will work without problems for Debian Edu installations.
It seemed that you just needed to change a few bits in the packaging
4 matches
Mail list logo
