Bug#370349: we dont use inetutils-syslogd

2008-03-13 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:23:38 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: reopen 370349 unblock 311188 by 370349 thanks (This has been merged with 462739 which was grave, although I'm not really sure the severity is appropriate). On Monday 28 January 2008 04:55, Guillem wrote: Who is we? :) We

Bug#370349: we dont use inetutils-syslogd

2008-01-28 Thread Holger Levsen
reopen 370349 unblock 311188 by 370349 thanks Hi Guillem, On Monday 28 January 2008 04:55, Guillem wrote: Who is we? :) We is Debian Edu here :) And why would the fact that that we is not using it anymore make this bug invalid? Right. As nobody has replied to this bug before, I was under

Bug#370349: we dont use inetutils-syslogd

2008-01-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:20:04 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: as we dont use inetutils-syslogd (anymore?), we don't care about this anymore. Who is we? :) And why would the fact that that we is not using it anymore make this bug invalid? Holger (who thinks that this bug might actually