Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 16:12 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Thanks. I'm downgrading it to important - I expect a new upstream at the end of this month that will resolve the bug. I'll check whether or not to make an upload to Debian for the time inbetween. I expect a new upstream version within

Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-15 Thread Oliver Paulus
Package: squirrelmail Version: 2:1.4.4-8 There is a local file include vulnerability in redirect.php (information disclosure). For more information see: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18231 Example URI: http://www.example.com/[squirrelmail

Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
severity 373731 serious tags 373731 security confirmed upstream thanks On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:42:01PM +0200, Oliver Paulus wrote: There is a local file include vulnerability in redirect.php (information disclosure). For more information see: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18231

Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello all, up until the first nul byte. I see that the plugins[] array is actually never reset in the squirrelmail source or configuration, allowing for this kind of things. Right, I agree that the bug exists; it has been discussed on the upstream [EMAIL PROTECTED] list but I appearently

Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: As you might know: - the Debian 'squirrelmail' Apache configuration ships with rg disabled; - the Debian 'php4' configuration ships with rg disabled; - it is well known and well documented that enabling register_globals is a security risk. Therefore, someone who

Bug#373731: squirrelmail redirect.php local file include vulnerability

2006-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
severity 373731 important thanks On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 14:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: I don't think this warrants a security update for stable. Thanks. I'm downgrading it to important - I expect a new upstream at the end of this month that will resolve the bug. I'll check whether or not