Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-06-17 Thread Anthony Juckel
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Netinst CD Image Image version: Nightly amd64 build downloaded 2006-06-17 from debian.org Date: 2006-06-17 21:30:00 Machine: Homebuilt AMD 64 desktop PC Processor: AMD 64 3200+ Memory: 1GB Partitions: Windows partition on hda1, / on hda2 Base System In

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-06-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 18 June 2006 05:15, Anthony Juckel wrote: > As stated in the subject, after setting up the initial users, I > abruptly get the base-installer/no_codename error. Attached are the > log files. Thanks for including the logs. This was quite a hard one to trace. It seems that the daily buil

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-06-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 19 June 2006 04:53, you wrote: > This latest image does indeed have version 1.16 of cdrom-detect, but > it appears to have a kernel version issue. The installer is running > version 2.6.15, while all the udebs on the cd image are for kernel > 2.6.16. Right. That was a change that needed

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-06-19 Thread Anthony Juckel
FYI, the 2006-06-20 amd64 netinst image is still using a 2.6.15 kernel, so I still get the same module load error. I've got a vested interest in testing the nightlies until I get a version that works for me, so I'll keep relating my experience until I get the system up and running. I've subscrib

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-06-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 04:40, Anthony Juckel wrote: > FYI, the 2006-06-20 amd64 netinst image is still using a 2.6.15 > kernel, so I still get the same module load error. I've got a vested > interest in testing the nightlies until I get a version that works for > me, so I'll keep relating my expe

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-07-01 Thread Anthony Juckel
On 6/20/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I saw on IRC that there was a script error that prevented mirror synchronization again, which has been fixed. However, I also see there have been no new AMD64 d-i images built the last 2 days... I've contacted the relevant people. If you want to

Bug#374228: installation-reports: Installation failed with base-installer/no_codename on AMD64

2006-07-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 01 July 2006 23:15, Anthony Juckel wrote: > Took me a bit to actually get back and try this installer, but I > thought I should finish the conversation. I did successfully install > debian using the new netinst image after this syncing problem was > cleared up. Thanks for all your wor