Debian Bugs database)
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: July 24, 2006 11:41:36 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in
install of powerpc, lspci
lspci is present in current daily builds. Closing this bug.
--
see shy jo
Well ac
On Sunday 23 July 2006 08:53, Rick Thomas wrote:
> So there seems to be a difference between "tasksel" and "aptitude" in
> their behavior on a missing CDrom. In an earlier part of this
> report I said that "aptitude" had hung. I believe now that it was
> actually "tasksel" that hung. Sorry for
On Jul 22, 2006, at 6:11 AM, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 05:59:02AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
so it hung. (Does hanging if the CD is not inserted count as a bug?)
It depends on the kind of "hanging". If APT just asks you to insert a
special CD I think this is OK and expected.
On Saturday 22 July 2006 11:59, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Hmmm... Does it matter that I first did a "bare bones" install ( by
> un-checking the default "desktop" task)? Then when I later went back
> to pick up something that is normally installed as part of the
> Desktop task, it tried to go to the CD
On Saturday 22 July 2006 13:10, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 05:59:02AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > so it hung. (Does hanging if the CD is not inserted count as a bug?)
>
> If it did not ask you to insert it, yes.
It may not be an apt error though, but a kernel driver issue.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 05:59:02AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> so it hung. (Does hanging if the CD is not inserted count as a bug?)
If it did not ask you to insert it, yes.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 05:59:02AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jens Seidel wrote:
> >There are at least two ways to add a CD to APT:
> > 1) By using apt-cdrom which adds a deb cdrom:[...] stanza to
> >sources.list
> > 2) By accessing a mounted CD: "deb file:/mnt/etc
On Jul 22, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi Rick,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 03:55:28AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Hmmm... That doesn't square with my recent experience. I've had
aptitude hang on me a couple of times with messages saying
(approximately -- from memory) "can't read cdrom".
Hi Rick,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 03:55:28AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Hmmm... That doesn't square with my recent experience. I've had
> aptitude hang on me a couple of times with messages saying
> (approximately -- from memory) "can't read cdrom". If you want, I
> can explore this behavi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Thomas wrote:
> But, it does *not* make sense for a businesscard or netinst install.
> For either of those, you must have reasonable network access to have any
> chance of succeeding. Making people keep their install CD around
> forever (or unti
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 04:09:23PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> PS: For the record -- this bug report mentions a couple other
> problems -- Neither of these installs encountered the problem with
> the missing "etc/mkinitramfs" directory. And both of them were
> missing the "lspci" command
On Jul 22, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:19:06PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 22:09, Rick Thomas wrote:
Putting the install CDrom into sources.list makes sense when you are
installing from a full CD (or DVD) set, because there's a large
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:19:06PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 21 July 2006 22:09, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Putting the install CDrom into sources.list makes sense when you are
> > installing from a full CD (or DVD) set, because there's a large
> > amount of significant information on them, *
On Friday 21 July 2006 22:09, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Putting the install CDrom into sources.list makes sense when you are
> installing from a full CD (or DVD) set, because there's a large
> amount of significant information on them, *and* the main reason why
> you might want to install that way is be
On Jul 21, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
I call BS :-D !
Joke aside, this i from a system installed on Monday via a
buisnesscard CD:
... snipped...
I don't see any CD source.
Maybe you were talking about netinst?
... "Curio
On Jul 21, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
I call BS :-D !
Joke aside, this i from a system installed on Monday via a
buisnesscard CD:
... snipped...
I don't see any CD source.
Maybe you were talking about netinst?
... "Curiouser and curioser!", cried Alice.
I'll try aga
On Friday 21 July 2006 01:24, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd
As I explained in response to your other mail, you should not use
etch_d-i, but daily images as linked from the project homepage.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On 21/07/06, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:13:51PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> Some testing also noted that /etc/apt/sources.list includes the
>> install CD as a source. I don't think this is a good idea
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:13:51PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Some testing also noted that /etc/apt/sources.list includes the
install CD as a source. I don't think this is a good idea -- it
means that I have to hang onto the install CD and pu
clone 379067 -1
retitle -1 lspic is missing
thanks mate
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:28:50PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> > 2) However, strangely, the "lspci" command seems to be missing
> >from the installed system. I *was* able to get it (
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:13:51PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Some testing also noted that /etc/apt/sources.list includes the
> install CD as a source. I don't think this is a good idea -- it
> means that I have to hang onto the install CD and put it in the drive
> every time I want to apt-
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
2) However, strangely, the "lspci" command seems to be missing
from the installed system. I *was* able to get it (as part of the
"pciutils" package) from the mirror via aptitude. So it's not
missing completely.
Interestingly... I had or
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network: [o]
Detect CD: [o]
Load installer modules: [o]
De
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
booted from daily businesscard CD
Image version:
| Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd
| NameLast
modified Size
|
| Parent
Directory
24 matches
Mail list logo
