Hi,
Please note that the patch as it is has a very awkward side effect: Every
time you run ntfsresize and either you answer no to the really proceed
question or ntfsresize aborts without doing anything because it hits a
this is not supported case or you try to resize to a too small size or
Hello Frans,
hello Andree,
Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like the
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like the
On Sunday 26 November 2006 02:13, you wrote:
Could you please also test that whether Vista boots if you remove
/pagefile.sys after ntfsresize? You can use ntfs-3g for this, it's in
Debian unstable. Usage: http://www.ntfs-3g.org/index.html#usage
Or use a LiveCD which has both. The above page
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I've stopped after the Win2k chkdsk as that turned out to be sufficient to
make Vista boot again, so running the Vista repair is unnecessary!
The md5sum check after running chkdsk showed only /pagefile.sys deleted.
Yes, there isn't really anything
5 matches
Mail list logo
