On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
Surely I would but I don't have much free time recently, and unfortunately
it doesn't help that seemingly you have checked in your entire private
ntfsprogs CVS in one commmit.
Nope, that was all written as a consequence to the changes to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
I didn't have time to check the patches yet but wasn't the Vista problem due
to a bug in libntfs and not because of ntfsresize?
The problem is that with my first patch which does not turn on
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
the resizing is over then the latter is
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
relocate_inodes(), relocate_inode(), especially the $MFT part. There is a
strict order in what and when is relocated. At some point ntfs_volume is
mostly used only for reading
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
relocate_inodes() - relocate_inode() - at the end of the function
calls write_mft_record() which uses the ntfs_volume and the libntfs
6 matches
Mail list logo
