Op zo, 24-09-2006 te 00:39 +0200, schreef Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > The failure is in the NOT in the build-arch target but in the
> > build-indep-stamp target as the log shows:
>
> That doesn't really matter.
I agree with that
> >
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> The failure is in the NOT in the build-arch target but in the
> build-indep-stamp target as the log shows:
That doesn't really matter.
> build *IS* called by the dpkg-buildpackage and as such by the build
> daemons which *IS* in th
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:39:44AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> IOW, you can't take build-indep out of build.
Oh, I missed the part of policy actually saying this out in clear (4.9):
The `build' target should depend on those of the targets `build-arch' and
`build-indep' that are pro
Op za, 23-09-2006 te 15:33 +0200, schreef Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
> > no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
> > actual upload?
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
> no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
> actual upload?
This patch looks wrong, sorry:
> -build: build-arch build-indep
> +bui
tags 379724 patch
usertag 379724 supplied-patch
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
actual upload?
Greetings Arjan
Changelog of my NMU:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Set urgen
6 matches
Mail list logo
