On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:32:31PM -0500, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>I've update and upload the package to
>
>http://people.debian.org/~santiago/
>
>Please, could you build it and confirm that the bug is solved? I don't
>have any amd64 machine.
I now have an amd64 virtual machine. \o/
I built
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> lib32bz2-dev and lib32bz2-1.0 have this:
[snipped]
That looks correct; please proceed with an upload when you get a
chance. (Also, thanks for copying me, which Santiago accidentally
forgot to do.)
Thanks.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at a
El mar, 22-08-2006 a las 09:46 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko escribió:
>
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > lib32bz2-dev and lib32bz2-1.0 have this:
> [snipped]
>
> That looks correct; please proceed with an upload when you get a
> chance.
I've uploaded the package.
> (Also,
Santiago Ruano Rincón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've uploaded the package.
Thanks!
> Ups. sorry for that.
No big deal.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Package: lib32bz2-1.0
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.6(4)
lib32bz2-1.0 and lib32bz2-dev install their files into /usr/lib32.
However, that path is a symlink (owned by libc6-i386) to
/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib, which other packages should populate
*directly*.
-- System In
5 matches
Mail list logo