hi thijs,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Checked with the Lintian maintainers, this is no problem as long as you
> don't mark the string as translatable (i.e.: omit the '_' in front of
> it), like this:
>
> Template: dbconfig-common/internal/reconfiguring
> Typ
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:13 -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > - Add 'for internal use' to an internal debconf template
>
> is it really worth labelling this? my thought was that not
> providing a description would make translators' li
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:13 -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > - Add 'for internal use' to an internal debconf template
>
> is it really worth labelling this? my thought was that not
> providing a description would make translators' li
hi thijs,
thanks for the contributions! one question:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> - Add 'for internal use' to an internal debconf template
is it really worth labelling this? my thought was that not
providing a description would make translators' lives eas
Package: dbconfig-common
Version: 1.8.17
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello Sean,
When I build dbconfig-common I get many lintian errors. I've made some
effort to eliminate the bulk of them (there's a few left):
- Recode the name of jfs in debian/changelog
- Check for latest policy and update
- R
5 matches
Mail list logo
