forwarded #380480 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3290
thanks
On dim, 2006-07-30 at 18:10 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez writes:
> > If the pointer after the wrap is in the same zone where it can start a
> > wrap, we could end up with a loop. In 4.4 implementation,
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 16:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In 4.2 moving the mouse of the edge of the screen forced the next
> workspace to be displayed and your mouse pointer ended up only a few
> pixels from the edge, certainly about 10 times fewer pixels than with
> version 4.4.
Ok,
> (I'm
Yves-Alexis Perez writes:
> If the pointer after the wrap is in the same zone where it can start a
> wrap, we could end up with a loop. In 4.4 implementation, the pointer
> ends out of this zone.
I don't really understand why the zone isn't just 1 or 2 pixels wide
rather than a 100 or more.
>
Yves-Alexis Perez writes:
> On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 14:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > When moving the mouse to the edge of the screen so that it flicks over
> > to the next workspace, the mouse position on the 'new' workspace is
> > about 200 pixels from the edge of the 'new' workspace. T
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 14:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When moving the mouse to the edge of the screen so that it flicks over
> to the next workspace, the mouse position on the 'new' workspace is
> about 200 pixels from the edge of the 'new' workspace. This is pretty
> anoying, especially if
5 matches
Mail list logo
