Bug#382700: CLR 1.1 vs 2.0 mess

2006-08-14 Thread Sam Clegg
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:47:55PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: first I thought the compiler is broken, but then I saw CLR v2.0 which means _bad_ things. I installed libmono2.0-cil which pulls the base CLR 2.0 packages in, and then booc didn't fail with that error, but with another saying the

Bug#382700: CLR 1.1 vs 2.0 mess

2006-08-14 Thread Mirco Bauer
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 09:33 +0100, Sam Clegg wrote: Well, to be honest, I only switched to gmcs (and therefore 2.0) because it seemed to be the default way for nant to build boo. CLR 2.0 is still far from stable and is not officially supported upstream, it's work in progress. Even Mono 1.2

Bug#382700: CLR 1.1 vs 2.0 mess

2006-08-12 Thread Mirco Bauer
Package: boo Version: 0.7.6.2237-3 Severity: serious I found that MonoDevelop FTBFS because of boo. Here the output of the boo compiler: mkdir -p ../../../build/AddIns/BackendBindings /usr/bin/booc -r:../../../build/bin/MonoDevelop.Core.dll -r:../../../build/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Core.Gui.dll