Bug#382893: acinclude.m4

2006-08-14 Thread zinx
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:26:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:28:38AM -0500, Zinx Verituse wrote: > > No, it's not the OSs, it's Debian's libtool package. Anything that uses > > file_magic is *still broken* because EGREP still isn't properly passed to > > the libtool sc

Bug#382893: acinclude.m4

2006-08-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:28:38AM -0500, Zinx Verituse wrote: > > It's not the OSs that cause the bug, but the old macro definitions in > > aclocal.m4. > > No, it's not the OSs, it's Debian's libtool package. Anything that uses > file_magic is *still broken* because EGREP still isn't properly pa

Bug#382893: acinclude.m4

2006-08-14 Thread Zinx Verituse
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:00:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Then the acinclude.m4 file likely contains macros from an older Libtool > version. Please tell upstream to update them; there are several ways to > achieve this, ranging from (brittle and error-prone) manual replacement > to just m

Bug#382893: acinclude.m4

2006-08-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Zinx Verituse wrote on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:52:34PM CEST: > Sorry; I should have paid more attention to which file I was reading. > That came from acinclude.m4, from the debian XMMS package (the m4 is > probably included with xmms), not aclocal.m4. Then the acinclude.m4 file likely contains m

Bug#382893: acinclude.m4

2006-08-14 Thread Zinx Verituse
Sorry; I should have paid more attention to which file I was reading. That came from acinclude.m4, from the debian XMMS package (the m4 is probably included with xmms), not aclocal.m4. The EGREP bug is still there, however - If someone somehow manages to trigger that codepath (various OSs still us