On Friday 18 August 2006 19:53, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
If I understand FS correctly, the 486 flavor of the kernel is still
UP, which means that we still have the same problem in the
installer...
Well, the installer won't know it's a smp system, but if it installs a
686+
Frans Pop wrote:
Yes, of course. Should have seen that :-P
So we can safely forget about the SMP issue :-)
Moreover, we can remove some of the not very well working code that
tries to detect smp:
rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S04countcpus-linux-x86
(but not
On Saturday 19 August 2006 22:12, Joey Hess wrote:
Moreover, we can remove some of the not very well working code that
tries to detect smp:
Done.
pgpVbAQWOLbwk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64. 2.6.17 don't longer provide UP
versions of the kernels.
Bastian
--
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:33, you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the
extra processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64. 2.6.17 don't longer
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Any idea if the HTT flag being present would be a reliable indication of
dual-core?
Not sure, but it sounds like a reasonable assumption.
Looks easy enough to implement if we get confirmation.
Care to send in the output of dmidecode
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:33, you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the
extra processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:32:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately there seems to be no way the extra
processors can be detected while running a UP kernel.
And fixed with 2.6.17 for i386 and amd64.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:59:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
And is there a way to override SMP detection on the kernel commandline?
2.6.17 still doesn't give me a reliable clock on my amd64 system when
running smp.
Boot with nosmp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
I just noticed that d-i chose to install a 686 kernel instead of a
686-smp kernel. Of course, with a non-SMP kernel installed
/proc/cpuinfo only shows 1 CPU. But, after I installed the SMP flavor
it has:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
On Friday 18 August 2006 01:04, dann frazier wrote:
I just noticed that d-i chose to install a 686 kernel instead of a
686-smp kernel. Of course, with a non-SMP kernel installed
/proc/cpuinfo only shows 1 CPU. But, after I installed the SMP flavor
it has:
That's a known issue. Unfortunately
12 matches
Mail list logo
