Do you have any information that would explain why it did this? I'll
need more data to do anything useful with this report.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Daniel,
I'll see if I can reproduce the symptoms and keep a careful log.
What logs/outputs would you like to to collect?
Rick
On Sep 1, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Do you have any information that would explain why it did this?
I'll
need more data to do anything usefu
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:34:16AM -0400, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> I'll see if I can reproduce the symptoms and keep a careful log.
> What logs/outputs would you like to to collect?
I think a good starting point would be a list of other packages that were
being upg
I'm wondering if this is similar to the problem that is described in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg00090.html
Certainly the pattern of dependency/pre-dependency seems similar...
What happened was this:
I had installed ntpdate, ntp-simple and ntp packages at the 4.2.0a
+stabl
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 01:35:13PM -0400, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
>
> I'm wondering if this is similar to the problem that is described in
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg00090.html
>
> Certainly the pattern of dependency/pre-dependency seems similar
On Sep 2, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
I plan to do a non-network install (dvd-only) of the beta3 dvd
(which should get me to the condition I was in before the problems)
then add a network repo to sources.list (which should attempt to
update to the dfsg versions) and see what happe
Hi Daniel,
Here's a strange one! I assume a bug-report is appropriate, and I'll
make one, but I'll need your help in figuring out which package to
report it against...
I have a machine ("darkstar") running etch, which I use for testing
debian installer things. I did an "aptitude update
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:53:18PM -0400, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Here's a strange one! I assume a bug-report is appropriate, and I'll
> make one, but I'll need your help in figuring out which package to
> report it against...
The problem here
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you on this.
It looks to me like the problem is this:
The ntp packages used to be split into ntp, ntp-simple, ntp-server,
and ntp-refclock. A few versions ago, they were merged into just ntp.
You explicitly installed ntp-simple, so ntp was considered
Package: aptitude
I just did an aptitude update/upgrade of an etch system. It resulted
in deleting ntp, ntp-simple, and ntp-server, leaving me without a
functioning ntp daemon.
Rick
"Not the sort of behavior you ordinarily expect from a major appliance"
- ghostbusters
--
To UNSUBSCR
10 matches
Mail list logo
