Hi,
> > Sounds good, I'll apply the patch; since I don't have a selinux system
> > that after I release the new version could you send logs of it
> > successfully running under selinux?
>
> Sure. But what do you expect to see from these logs?
> I can send you these right away, since I did this mo
Hi Junichi,
> Sounds good, I'll apply the patch; since I don't have a selinux system
> that after I release the new version could you send logs of it
> successfully running under selinux?
Sure. But what do you expect to see from these logs?
I can send you these right away, since I did this modific
Hi,
> > > if [ -x /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled ] && /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled; then
> > Is this condition enough to determine /selinux is mountable ?
>
> If selinux is enabled, /selinux has to be mounted AFAIK.
> So AFAIK that is the best way to test that selinux is enabled.
>
> > > mkdir -p $BUILD
Hi,
> > if [ -x /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled ] && /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled; then
> Is this condition enough to determine /selinux is mountable ?
If selinux is enabled, /selinux has to be mounted AFAIK.
So AFAIK that is the best way to test that selinux is enabled.
> > mkdir -p $BUILDPLACE/selinux
Hi,
> The workaround is simple - just mount /selinux
>
> suggested fix:
> in "/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-modules", add to mount_proc:
> ---
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled ] && /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled; then
Is this condition enough to determine /selinux is mountable ?
> mkdir -p $BUIL
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.157
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
currently, pbuilder won't run on SELinux systems, even in non-enforcing
("permissive") mode, where SELinux doesn't actually block any access.
I'd like to get pbuilder working for the "targeted" policy at least
(where processes can b
6 matches
Mail list logo
