On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you
make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling the new tarball
with the stuff inside the debian directory?
I just used the existing debian directory. zope-debhelper maybe
the next step.
I
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:30:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
>
> >I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple,
>
> This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you
> make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling
Il giorno mer, 30/08/2006 alle 08.51 +0200, Uwe Steinmann ha scritto:
> > BTW, I would be more than happy if somebody would take over zope-zms
> > because I do not use it any more.
> I thought so, but I cannot honestly offer to take it over, because
> my knowledge of zope is rather weak. Let me try
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple,
This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you
make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling the new tarball
with the stuff inside the debian directory?
BTW, I would
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:58:03PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> > > I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple,
> > > but I'm simply too u
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> > I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple,
> > but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it
> > work on zope3.
> >
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple,
> but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it
> work on zope3.
> Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3.
zope3 is a comp
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:48:56PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
>
> >Upstream is already at version 2.9. Is there any reason to keep zms
> >at 2.3.2?
>
> The reason is quite simple: Real live issues kept me away from those
> packages I regarded "not that
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
Upstream is already at version 2.9. Is there any reason to keep zms
at 2.3.2?
The reason is quite simple: Real live issues kept me away from those
packages I regarded "not that important". Your request shows that
it has some importance and I hope to g
9 matches
Mail list logo
