Bug#385784: aptitude: crash with basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid [stacktrace]

2006-09-12 Thread Michael Vogt
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: [..] Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Writing extended state information... Done Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog debconf:

Bug#385784: aptitude: crash with basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid [stacktrace]

2006-09-12 Thread Ross Boylan
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:03:53PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: [..] Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Writing extended state information... Done Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug

Bug#385784: aptitude: crash with basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid [stacktrace]

2006-09-03 Thread Ross Boylan
Here's the stack trace, which seems to indicate something going wrong in libc (or the kernel?), with libstdc++ possibly adding another layer of error on top of that. I don't know if the low-level exception is considered normal enough that it should be caught and dealt with. An excerpt from the

Bug#385784: aptitude: crash with basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid [stacktrace]

2006-09-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: Here's the stack trace, which seems to indicate something going wrong in libc (or the kernel?), with libstdc++ possibly adding another layer of error on top of that. I don't know if the low-level