Bug#385935: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package.

2006-09-22 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: I don't see how this will make it easier to use it. It might be easier to find it if you already knew the name of the virtual package, and basily already knew what you're looking for. But I don't see this as either useful, or

Bug#385935: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package.

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: I guess that should be reading stardict-dictionary, since that seems to be an existing virtual package. It doesn't seem to be used however. Yes, it should be reading stardict-dictionary and there is a follow up proposal for

Bug#385935: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package.

2006-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:36:31PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: I guess that should be reading stardict-dictionary, since that seems to be an existing virtual package. It doesn't seem to be used however. Yes, it should be

Bug#385935: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package.

2006-09-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:25:05AM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: Dear maintainer, My proposal has been posted on debian-devel for a few weeks, and seems no objected. So now I am retitling this bug and refine the brief description: I would like to propose stardict as a name of virtual package:

Bug#385935: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package.

2006-09-18 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 385935 debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Request for the 'stardict' virtual package. thanks. Dear maintainer, My proposal has been posted on debian-devel for a few weeks, and seems no objected. So now I am retitling this bug and refine the brief