Bug#386368: /dev/shm or /run/shm is still not mounted with noexec

2012-05-28 Thread Marc MERLIN
On 7 Jun 2010 the last update said shm would be noexec again. Is it still going to happen? Thanks, Marc -- A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems what McDonalds is to gourmet

Bug#386368: /dev/shm or /run/shm is still not mounted with noexec

2012-05-28 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:48:07AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: On 7 Jun 2010 the last update said shm would be noexec again. Is it still going to happen? Can't see why not. We've removed all the abusers of the /dev/shm namespace, so should be safe to do so. Are there any known uses of

Bug#386368: /dev/shm or /run/shm is still not mounted with noexec

2012-05-28 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 05:55:59PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:48:07AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: On 7 Jun 2010 the last update said shm would be noexec again. Is it still going to happen? Can't see why not. We've removed all the abusers of the /dev/shm