posted mailed
Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
Package: libmms
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
According to,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xine-develm=107261185004445w=2 , since
they can't find where to contact the author of majormms, either in
majormms website,
posted mailed
Loïc Minier wrote (in bug 330355):
I'm happy you took the time to verify this for Ubuntu. I did a quick
search in the xine-devel archive between 2004-01 and 2005-09
confirming:
- the announcement of the relicensing process
- confirmation that most persons, including Major
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
Ah; my understanding was that there were some parts (the xmms header
files?) which were GPL only, and that the rest of libmms was licenced
under the LGPL, which is what I retitled the bug to clarify. [If
that's actually the case, as debian/copyright
Loic Minier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
If there's one upstream that extract and modify dll files from Windows Media
Player and relicense those dll to some freeware license, then this upstream
software
can be packaged into Debian/non-free? Although it is
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
So I could give another example.
If the new project copy code from Qt and the project itself is licensed under
LGPL. While it is obviously that some parts of code is from Qt, and no any
approval from trolltech to be relicensed,
severity 386406 important
tags 386406 + moreinfo
retitle 386406 Some bits might not have been properly relicensed, but please
provide/gather more information
stop
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
Loic: The only actual (minor) issue here is that the package doesn't
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
Loic: The only actual (minor) issue here is that the package doesn't
reference the GPL and include the copyright+licensing statement of the
parts that are GPL licensed. It would also be useful to include the
retitle 386406 debian/copyright should include actual text of the copyright
statement and reference LGPL and GPL
severity 386406 minor
thanks
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
According to Section 3 of LGPL, Debian or anyone can relicense LGPL
software into the ordinary GPL.
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
If there's one upstream that extract and modify dll files from Windows Media
Player and relicense those dll to some freeware license, then this upstream
software
can be packaged into Debian/non-free? Although it is apparently that
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Lo?c Minier
Now, what is the basis of your claims that this might not be LGPL?
What new information did you find?
And why are you discussing this with Debian? This seems like an
upstream problem to me and something to discuss with upstream. I
severity 386406 important
tags 386406 + moreinfo
stop
Hi Anon,
I'm lowering the severity of your bug until you clarify your claims.
Please send me the new information you have found.
I take licensing very seriously, but you didn't point to material that
wasn't already known when I
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
According to,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xine-develm=107261185004445w=2 , since
they can't find where to contact the author of majormms, either in
majormms website, http://www.geocities.com/majormms/ , and its source,
Package: libmms
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
According to,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xine-develm=107261185004445w=2 , since
they can't find where to contact the author of majormms, either in
majormms website, http://www.geocities.com/majormms/ , and its source,
13 matches
Mail list logo
