Bug#387166: lintian: Failed to identify Priorities error: Policy 2.5.

2006-09-12 Thread Russ Allbery
severity 387166 wishlist retitle 387166 [checks/fields] diagnose priority inversion within a source package thanks Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: lintian > Version: 1.23.24 > Severity: important A missing check in lintian is not an important bug in the lintian package itse

Bug#387166: lintian: Failed to identify Priorities error: Policy 2.5.

2006-09-12 Thread Neil Williams
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.24 Severity: important A recent upload of QOF included two new packages. The main library is dependent on at least one of these new packages being installed and is Priority: optional. However, I inadvertently put the two new packages as Priority: extra and lintian di