On 19-Oct-2010, Axel Beckert wrote:
> I still believe we can get both cases where they don't interfere. Of
> course if there are different table entries for each order, they
> should be honoured. But if there's only one entry for a given
> combination, both orders should work.
I don't have an inte
Hi Ben,
Ben Finney wrote:
> On 19-Oct-2010, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > This is probably cause by the code at the end of the patch causes
> > that the order of digraphs are no more interchangeable.
>
> That's necessary, since RFC1345 defines many mnemonics that are only
> distinguished from others by
On 19-Oct-2010, Axel Beckert wrote:
> This is probably cause by the code at the end of the patch causes
> that the order of digraphs are no more interchangeable.
That's necessary, since RFC1345 defines many mnemonics that are only
distinguished from others by the sequence of characters.
> Without
3 matches
Mail list logo
