* Carsten Hey [2011-03-20 10:28 +0100]:
> ... As noted above, the remaining part of this bug could and should
> be fixed in apt[1] instead.
JFTR, since already apt/squeeze provides a sane interface that could be
used by keyring packages, an other way of getting rid of the gnupg
dependency seems t
* Carsten Hey [2010-08-13 01:37 +0200]:
> I don't see how this bug could be fixed in debian-archive-keyring but
> think it should be fixed in apt instead. ...
>
> Thus I propose to make apt's implicit dependeny on gnupg explicit to be
> able to fix #387688 for Squeeze+1 and still provide a clean u
* Thijs Kinkhorst [2010-08-22 16:57 +0200]:
> On Sun, August 22, 2010 00:46, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > * Build a new package gpgv-tiny, configured with --without-readline.
>
> Just wondering here if there would be any need for a regular 'gpgv'
> package if 'gpgv-tiny' exists. In other words, we could
* Philipp Kern [2010-08-22 16:10 +0200]:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > * Placing packaged keyrings in, e.g., /var/lib/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ might
> >be preferable to using /etc/; on the other side, above-mentioned
> >description sounds like /etc/ is intend
On Sun, August 22, 2010 00:46, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Build a new package gpgv-tiny, configured with --without-readline.
Just wondering here if there would be any need for a regular 'gpgv'
package if 'gpgv-tiny' exists. In other words, we could already build gpgv
separately, without readline, rig
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Placing packaged keyrings in, e.g., /var/lib/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ might
>be preferable to using /etc/; on the other side, above-mentioned
>description sounds like /etc/ is intended to be used for this.
Or symlinks, so that the
[ dropping the gnupg bug and d-rele...@l.d.o from To:/CC: since this
mail does not seem to be relevant there ]
* Philipp Kern [2010-08-22 11:24 +0200]:
> On 08/22/2010 12:46 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> >By removing the (currently indirect) apt dependencies on gnupg and
> >libusb-0.1-4 and making ap
On 08/22/2010 12:46 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
By removing the (currently indirect) apt dependencies on gnupg and
libusb-0.1-4 and making apt depend on gpgv (or gpgv | gpgv-tiny)
instead, 5272 kB could be saved. There are ways to accomplish this for
Squeeze+1, how it could be done seems to be nothin
* Philipp Kern [2010-08-15 13:30 +0200]:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:37:15AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > currently apt depends on debian-archive-keyring which depends on
> > gnupg. It has been proposed to remove the latter dependency in
> > #387688, this would save about 5 MB of disk space in a
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:37:15AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> currently apt depends on debian-archive-keyring which depends on gnupg.
> It has been proposed to remove the latter dependency in #387688, this
> would save about 5 MB of disk space in a sid debootstrap.
I'm still not sure if I buy thi
Hi,
currently apt depends on debian-archive-keyring which depends on gnupg.
It has been proposed to remove the latter dependency in #387688, this
would save about 5 MB of disk space in a sid debootstrap.
I don't see how this bug could be fixed in debian-archive-keyring but
think it should be fixe
11 matches
Mail list logo
