Re: Thijs Kinkhorst 2006-10-23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I propose binutils-h8300-hms to be removed, for the following reasons: > > * Orphaned for two monts without any sign of interest;
binutils-h8300-hms is needed for compiling binaries on brickos, so #387769, #387770, #387771, and #387772 should be adopted (preferably, I've successfully used the packages) or removed together. > * Has an RC bug (non-free docs); I'll have a look at that. > * Last MU four years (!) ago; > * Very few users in popcon (4 votes). Please don't weight the 'votes' column too much, popcon just looks at a single file in the package, and especially for packages with a large number of binaries (as binutils-*), the algorithm is likely to pick one that isn't used much. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
