From: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File them against general (or whatever existing pseudo package is most
appropriate) and I'll reassign them when I create the pseudopackage.
I also need to know which mailing list/person is going to be
responsible for the psuedopackage. You also
Hi,
according to recent discussion on the debian-i18n mailing list I
would really support the idea of this pseudopackage. You might
like to read for instance the posting
http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2008/07/msg00272.html
where I feel a big need to report bugs (at least three from
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
according to recent discussion on the debian-i18n mailing list I
would really support the idea of this pseudopackage. You might
like to read for instance the posting
http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2008/07/msg00272.html
where I feel a big
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tag: moreinfo
* Submitter: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
At the the i18n Extremadura Meeting[1] we discussed how to be able
to handle i18n and l10n bugs more conveniently and having a way to
be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2006 06:35 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
(Replying only to list for discussion.)
I was not in Extremadura, so this is mostly a request for clarification...
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
At the the i18n Extremadura
5 matches
Mail list logo
