Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-24 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 04:25 schrieb Rick Thomas: But that information is not available in the if-up script. There are ways to find it out. If you like, I'll do up and test a sample. Please. Will do. I hope to get back to you

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 04:25 schrieb Rick Thomas: > > But that information is not available in the if-up script. > > There are ways to find it out. If you like, I'll do up and test a > sample. Please. > >> If so, would it be desirable to have them officially conflict? > > > > No. > > For

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: So the logic in /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate needs to be a bit like the login in the old /etc/init.d/ntpdate in that it knows whether it's being called as part of system initialization or on-the-fly after initialization.

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rick Thomas wrote: > So the logic in /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate needs to be a bit like > the login in the old /etc/init.d/ntpdate in that it knows whether > it's being called as part of system initialization or on-the-fly > after initialization. But that information is not available in the if-up

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Again, check the package in unstable. That's the direction. Thanks for the pointer. I've looked at the ntpdate_4.2.2+dfsg.2-2 stuff now, and I have a couple of comments on that. The first is just an extension of this original

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rick Thomas wrote: > What am I missing? I'm tempted to say knowledge of the Debian development process, which would have hinted you to the fact that if you are running testing, a newer package version is possibly to be found in unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: I was Poking around in /var/log/syslog recently. I noticed that there was no log entry for ntpdate. Investigating a little, I found that /etc/init.d/ntpdate (alias /etc/rcS.d/S51ntpdate) is called before syslogd gets sta

Bug#388328: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rick Thomas wrote: > I was Poking around in /var/log/syslog recently. I noticed that > there was no log entry for ntpdate. Investigating a little, I found > that /etc/init.d/ntpdate (alias /etc/rcS.d/S51ntpdate) is called > before syslogd gets started. The latest ntpdate package does not contain

Bug#388328: boot logging fix for ntpdate in /etc/init.d

2006-09-19 Thread Rick Thomas
Package: ntpdate I was Poking around in /var/log/syslog recently. I noticed that there was no log entry for ntpdate. Investigating a little, I found that /etc/init.d/ntpdate (alias /etc/rcS.d/S51ntpdate) is called before syslogd gets started. This is OK... The ntpdate call has to occur