tags #388460 confirmed pending
thanks
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:10:16PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I think that it is ok that sender and recipient address verification
does not work for smarthost setups by default.
The fact that it took years for somebody to actually discover that
On 2006-09-21 Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
We'll need to think about a way to support sender verification on a
system that uses a smarthost. Andreas' suggestion is a possible
solution, but we'll need to bring our minimaldns configuration option
in the game: We might be using a
On 20/09/06, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interesting bit is this one:
[...]
check !verify = sender
Verifying [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
dsaodpojdopj.com in ! +local_domains? yes (end of list)
R: smarthost for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
calling smarthost router
smarthost router
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:31:09AM +0100, George B. wrote:
Why on earth does Exim call the smarthost for a local address? :-/
It looks like that your smarthost router is not recognizing the domain
as local (... is in ! +local_domains? yes.)
Does it correctly route the address as in
exim -bt
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like that your smarthost router is not recognizing the domain
as local (... is in ! +local_domains? yes.)
Does it correctly route the address as in
exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as a local domain?
I did: exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:23:17AM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like that your smarthost router is not recognizing the domain
as local (... is in ! +local_domains? yes.)
Does it correctly route the address as in
exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that's the same address you want to fail verification?
No, that is the recipient address. I am trying to verify sender
addresses. Doing the exim -bt ... test with any other (non-local,
even if it is a fake, non-existent domain) address
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
I am not sure whether Andreas' Diagnosis is right.
I am sure now that Andreas' is right. I'll need to ponder (and ask
exim-users) how to solve this.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
And that's the same address you want to fail verification?
No, it is not. After you answered my question in private e-mail (on
purpose?), I now understand the issue. Finally. Sorry for being so
slow on the mark.
We'll need to think
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:31:09AM +0100, George B. wrote:
Why on earth does Exim call the smarthost for a local address? :-/
The sender you are trying is not a local address, and everything
nonlocal is passed on to the smarthost.
2# setting no_verify on the smarthost router and having a
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:53:39PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
1# using callouts for verification
Only if the smarthost rejects invalid RCPT commands immediately.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | I don't
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
And that's the same address you want to fail verification?
No, it is not. After you answered my question in private e-mail (on
purpose?), I now understand the issue. Finally. Sorry for
Package: exim4-daemon-light
Version: 4.63-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
For some reason, sender verification does not seem to work on my Etch
Exim4 server. I have 2 Sarge servers with nearly identical
configurations that have sender verification working just fine.
I attach the config.autogenerated
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:26:39PM +0100, George B. wrote:
I attach the config.autogenerated file for the problem server.
I do not see the attachment.
I have set the appropriate option in the macros file
Which option, which macros file?
Try exim4 -d -bh some-ip-address and simulate an SMTP
On 20/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:26:39PM +0100, George B. wrote:
I attach the config.autogenerated file for the problem server.
I do not see the attachment.
Yeah I noticed, sorry. I posted a followup, but BTS took some time to accept.
I have set
On 2006-09-20 George B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Try exim4 -d -bh some-ip-address and simulate an SMTP session with a
invalid sender on the terminal. The debug output will probably help.
If not, send the debug output to the bug report.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
