Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Christian Perrier
user debian-i18n@lists.debian.org uertags 388929 not-fixed thanks Hence, I am closing this bug report, as I intend to leave the package as is. This is my final say on the matter. BTW, tagging the bug wontfix and not closing it would have been fair to the general MBF action. I won't play BTS

Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Christian Perrier
I've been pondering about changing the type of the debconf prompt from note to error. After reading the description for the error type, I came to the conclusion that the debconf note type was fine for this use case, and that using the error type instead would not buy anything to the user and

Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Julien BLACHE
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. Be prepared for the drop support for debconf notes discussion that will certainly happen after etch, then..:-) That seems to be in Joey Hess plans...better prepare it. I'm a bit disappointed by Joey's recent behaviour with regard to both

Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Julien BLACHE
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Christian, BTW, tagging the bug wontfix and not closing it would have been fair to the general MBF action. No, because it's not a wontfix case. It's a this is not a bug because the proposed fix isn't fit for this use case, so there's no bug to

Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Christian Perrier
I won't play BTS wars by reopening it but I leave the call to you, Julien. Partly fixing this with usertags I won't play BTS ping-pong with you either, so please be so kind as to remove this misleading usertag :) I really suggest that you don't touch our usertags. And, of

Bug#388929: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mcelog: debconf type note is fine for this use case)

2006-10-09 Thread Julien BLACHE
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really suggest that you don't touch our usertags. And, of course, no I will not remove this usertag. Looks like some of our colleagues were right in their reactions to your mass bug-filing. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer -