Hi Luk!
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
Recommending a package which is not available is an important bug for a
package in main for the moment.
True. I changed it to a suggest for now (which is allowed), and hope
that prosper is fixed somewhen. After this I can go back to recommends.
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Luk!
Hi Norbert
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
Recommending a package which is not available is an important bug for a
package in main for the moment.
True. I changed it to a suggest for now (which is allowed), and hope
that prosper is fixed somewhen.
Hi,
Your package recommends prosper ( 1.00.4+cvs.2004.03.29-2) which is not yet
available in unstable.
Yes, we asume that the next version of prosper will have texlive as
alternative dependencies, then it can be used with texlive, too. This
is not a bug in texlive, the versioned recommends is
Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
Your package recommends prosper ( 1.00.4+cvs.2004.03.29-2) which is not yet
available in unstable.
Yes, we asume that the next version of prosper will have texlive as
alternative dependencies, then it can be used with texlive, too. This
is not a bug in texlive,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
Recommending a not installable package doesn't bring you much, though I can
understand your reasoning. I hope this gets fixed soon as it's only confusing
this way...
It is also related to the inofficial fixed packages available at
deb
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Severity: important
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Hi
Your package recommends prosper ( 1.00.4+cvs.2004.03.29-2) which is not yet
available in unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B
6 matches
Mail list logo
