-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
quite a large number of debian servers, all running 2.6 fine. However,
If you're uninterested and uneffected by the bug #389720( which by the way,
has already been fixed) why are you trolling and wasting my and Ola's
time?
You are using kernel patch 1.2.11-rc1? This patch is only for 2.4
kernels, and 2.4 kernels are not supported in etch.
Woa, this is new..and huge, AFAIK only 2.2 support is supposed to be
dropped from etch:
support for 2.2 kernels has been dropped (except for m68k). libc will
refuse to be
Hello,
According to #vserver folks:
13:39 daniel_hozac however, distro packages really ought to build with
--enable-apis=NOLEGACY.
13:39 daniel_hozac (which ironically means to enable the legacy APIs :))
this should fix the problem.
--- debian/rules.orig 2006-09-30 13:42:09.0
Hi
I have made a test build that I want you to test.
I have placed it at:
http://debian.opal.dhs.org/util-vserver_0.30.210-11_i386.deb
Please try and report if that works for you. If it do, then I'll check
in the changes, build a real debian package and upload the solution.
Regards,
// Ola
I have made a test build that I want you to test.
I have placed it at:
http://debian.opal.dhs.org/util-vserver_0.30.210-11_i386.deb
It works OK, thanks.
just one tiny thing:
Setting up util-vserver (0.30.210-11) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/util-vserver ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
You are using kernel patch 1.2.11-rc1? This patch is only for 2.4
kernels, and 2.4 kernels are not supported in etch.
Woa, this is new..and huge, AFAIK only 2.2 support is supposed to be
dropped from etch:
support
quite a large number of debian servers, all running 2.6 fine. However,
If you're uninterested and uneffected by the bug #389720( which by the way,
has already been fixed) why are you trolling and wasting my and Ola's
time?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0
Hi
Corrected version is uploaded now.
That version is uploaded to the debian.opal.dhs.org location as well. It
corrects
the other issue that you found as well.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
I have made a test build that I want you to test.
Hi
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:46:01PM +0200, Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
quite a large number of debian servers, all running 2.6 fine. However,
If you're uninterested and uneffected by the bug #389720( which by the way,
has already been fixed) why are you trolling and wasting my and Ola's
time?
tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
1.2.11-rc1,
If you make a new kernel using the latest kernel patches, do it work
better for you?
this is the latest patch.
Hi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:51:32PM +0200, Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
1.2.11-rc1,
If you make a new kernel using the
Hi
Your 0.30.204 packages are working fine.
I'll see what I can do.
Great, thanks.
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
1.2.11-rc1,
You are using kernel patch 1.2.11-rc1?
Subject: Complete and unexpected failure after util-vserver upgrade
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.210-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Here's the snippet:
Setting up util-vserver (0.30.210-10) ...
Stopping the reboot manager
/etc/init.d/rebootmgr: line 37: kill:
tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
thanks
Hi
You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
If you make a new kernel using the latest kernel patches, do it work
better for you?
Regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 27,
15 matches
Mail list logo