severity 389934 important
thanks
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061126 07:27]:
However, the best course of action is to fix these bugs for Etch so that
the release team does not have to make such compromise between
stability and security. It is possible to achieve that thanks to
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:42:17AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
severity 389934 important
thanks
I upgraded the severity with permission from Steve.
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061126 07:27]:
However, the best course of action is to fix these bugs for Etch so that
the release
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061127 15:20]:
I upgraded the severity with permission from Steve.
Yes. Nobody said you did something wrong.
As far as I am concerned, this is not a release goal, just basic
sanity of the distribution, much like checking packages actually
build from
severity 389934 serious
thanks
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:24:22AM -080O0, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Bill,
So my own opinion is that this class of bug should not be RC, at least when
the embedded rpath doesn't lie in an obviously user-writable space such as
/home or /tmp. If you feel strongly
Hi Bill,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 07:13:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:31:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
severity 389934 important
I don't see how you reached this conclusion. Users
5 matches
Mail list logo
