On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:31:32 +0100 Josip Rodin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been derelict lately; the patch is fine by me, provided it works,
> I don't have any explicit comments :)
>
> One might hesitate to include it because there is no more upstream
> development of gman, but the change i
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:17:09AM +0100, BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
> Any comment?
I've been derelict lately; the patch is fine by me, provided it works,
I don't have any explicit comments :)
One might hesitate to include it because there is no more upstream
development of gman, but the change is
Any comment?
Best regards,
norbi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's some confusion in package version: I installed my patched version
on my machine, and I forgot to reinstall the package from Sarge before
creating the bug report (so it contains my modified package's version in
the version field). Sorry.
norbi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: gman
Version: 0.9.3-2.nix.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
GMan currently sets xterm's icon name to 'GMan', which is not too
informative.. (Consider the user has half a dozen of these manual pages
open, most of them iconified.) I'd prefer if the name of the manual page
is included in
5 matches
Mail list logo