Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Steve Kemp
Hi, Are you still interested in adopting, with sponsorship, dsniff? If not I will make a new upload with the maintainer set to QA over the next day or two. (I don't want to have the package be in the etch release with my name still on it, when I've given up maintaining packages.)

Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Luciano Bello
El Jueves, 2 de Noviembre de 2006 07:51, Steve Kemp escribió: Hi, Are you still interested in adopting, with sponsorship, dsniff? If not I will make a new upload with the maintainer set to QA over the next day or two. (I don't want to have the package be in the etch release with

Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Steve Kemp
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:41:18AM -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: I has working in some bugs. Dun tell me that he will release a new version (rewriten from scratch) in the next weeks. But, as you point, etch will be release soon. Great! So i will upload a new package in these days (maybe

Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Daniel Baumann
Steve Kemp wrote: I'm sure that the debian-mentors list would find you a sponsor fairly easily if you don't already have one. Luciano! :) i'm pretty sure you already have a sponsor, if not.. it would be an honor for me to do it. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,

Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Luciano Bello
El Jueves, 2 de Noviembre de 2006 16:16, Daniel Baumann escribió: i'm pretty sure you already have a sponsor, if not.. it would be an honor for me to do it. Hi panthera! Will be great be sponsored by you. Please, take a look to http://home.lucianobello.com.ar/dsniff/2.4b1-15/ I

Bug#390822: Still willing to adopt dsniff?

2006-11-02 Thread Daniel Baumann
Luciano Bello wrote: http://home.lucianobello.com.ar/dsniff/2.4b1-15/ * you're modifying sshcrypt.c through diff.gz directly, but all other modifications are done with dpatch.. intentionally? * you rebuild the orig.tar.gz without the CVS files. however, this isn't allowed for an already