On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
Hi again.
I have probed option UseMmap = no and problem dissapear. Now memory
use of
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
Hi again.
I have probed option UseMmap = no and problem dissapear. Now memory
use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
Is there any bad
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
Hi again.
I have
El martes 24 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
I meant to close the Debian bug with an agreement from DaVinci ;)
I agree :)
Thank you very much.
David
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
El martes 24 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
I meant to close the Debian bug with an agreement from DaVinci ;)
I agree :)
Done;)
Elimar
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ Phear the Penguin
^^-^^
Hi again.
I have probed option UseMmap = no and problem dissapear. Now memory
use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
Is there any bad effect in not using Mmap?
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
Hi again.
I have probed option UseMmap = no and problem dissapear. Now memory
use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
Is there any bad effect in not using Mmap?
No, mmap was supposed to improve performance, but
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
[...]
I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumption,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
[...]
I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumption,
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
El martes 10 de octubre, Damian Pietras escribió:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With other players
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
In time that I have written this message, moc is playing a flac file
from Schubert 9ª symphony. Only 2º movement, 15 minutes, and these
are columns from top:
RESSHR %MEM
57m 54m 5.8
When music
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
[...]
I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want
to know: do you all experience a constant used memory increment
when running moc?
I'd like to know if that fact is normal, perhaps effect of
mmaping, and
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
[...]
I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
know: do you all experience a constant used memory increment when
running moc?
Running mocp
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:44PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
[...]
I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
know: do you all experience a
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:44PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
[...]
I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
know: do you all experience a
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
[...]
I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumption,
but you can try the attached patch.
Running mocp patched shows increasing
Package: moc
Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus, that
account is constant along time. In mocp, it increments progresively.
Greets.
forwarded 392106 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 392106 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
Package: moc
Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
Package: moc
Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus, that
account is constant along time. In mocp,
El martes 10 de octubre, Damian Pietras escribió:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus,
that account is constant along time. In mocp, it
20 matches
Mail list logo
