On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
> El martes 24 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> > I meant to close the Debian bug with an agreement from DaVinci ;)
>
> I agree :)
Done;)
Elimar
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
^^-^^
El martes 24 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> I meant to close the Debian bug with an agreement from DaVinci ;)
I agree :)
Thank you very much.
David
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> > Damian Pietras told:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> > > > Hi again.
> >
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> > Hi again.
> >
> > I have probed option "UseMmap = no" and problem dissapear. Now memory
> > use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
> >
> > Is the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:13:56PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> Damian Pietras told:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> > > Hi again.
> > >
> > > I have probed option "UseMmap = no" and problem dissapear. Now memo
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:19:17PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> I have probed option "UseMmap = no" and problem dissapear. Now memory
> use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
>
> Is there any bad effect in not using Mmap?
No, mmap was supposed to improve performan
Hi again.
I have probed option "UseMmap = no" and problem dissapear. Now memory
use of moc server is not greater than 0.4% in my machine.
Is there any bad effect in not using Mmap?
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> Damian Pietras told:
>
> [...]
> > I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
> > I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumptio
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> Damian Pietras told:
>
> [...]
> > I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
> > I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumpt
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Damian Pietras told:
[...]
> I've discovered a memory leak in the code that read tags for FLAC files.
> I don't really belive that this could cause such big memory consumption,
> but you can try the attached patch.
Running mocp patched shows increasing
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:44PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> > DaVinci told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
> > > know: do you all expe
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:08:44PM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> > DaVinci told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
> > > know: do you all expe
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
> DaVinci told:
>
> [...]
> > I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want to
> > know: do you all experience a constant used memory increment when
> > running moc?
>
> Runn
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
[...]
> I have not tryed. I'll see it playing a gigantic list. But I want
> to know: do you all experience a constant used memory increment
> when running moc?
>
> I'd like to know if that fact is normal, perhaps effect of
> mmaping,
El miércoles 11 de octubre, Elimar Riesebieter escribió:
> > In time that I have written this message, moc is playing a flac file
> > from Schubert 9ª symphony. Only 2º movement, 15 minutes, and these
> > are columns from top:
> >
> > RESSHR %MEM
> > 57m 54m 5.8
> >
> > W
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
> El martes 10 de octubre, Damian Pietras escribió:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> > > I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
> > > consumes a great account of memory. With other p
El martes 10 de octubre, Damian Pietras escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> > I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
> > consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus,
> > that account is constant along time. In mocp,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:47:35AM +0200, DaVinci wrote:
> Package: moc
> Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
> consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus, that
> account is constant along time. In m
forwarded 392106 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 392106 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
DaVinci told:
> Package: moc
> Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
> consumes a great account of memory. W
Package: moc
Version: 2.4.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
I don't understand why, but if mocp is much time playing music, it
consumes a great account of memory. With other players like cmus, that
account is constant along time. In mocp, it increments progresively.
Greets.
20 matches
Mail list logo
