Hi Simon,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:53:41 +0200
Simon Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/16/07, Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the voices in my head tell me not to change package names
just for fun ;-)
Look, this clearly violates the principle of least surprise
I got hit by this today. It was more amusing than frustrating but
since a friend pointed me to this bug, I'll spell out the current
silliness:
The package epiphany-browser installs an executable named
epiphany. The package epiphany installs an executable named
epiphany-game. This is crazy. I
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:06:03 +0200
Simon Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got hit by this today. It was more amusing than frustrating but
Glad you were amused.
since a friend pointed me to this bug, I'll spell out the current
silliness:
The package epiphany-browser installs an
On 8/16/07, Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, the voices in my head tell me not to change package names just
for fun ;-)
Look, this clearly violates the principle of least surprise (the game
doesn't even have a Wikipedia page; the browser is GNOME's browser).
If you're going
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:12:03PM +0200, Ricardo Mones
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:16:09 -0400 Jason Spiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(The browser has significantly higher popcon scores and
is used by many more people than the game.)
Which demostrates the package name is highly
You are right in that I should not make assertions based on assumptions.
...people should learn to use apt-cache show/search to see what's going
to install instead of posting bug reports about package names ;-)
Name conflicts are extremely rare in the open-source world. Because of
this, I,
Package: epiphany
Version: 0.5.1-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
When people think about epiphany, they usually are thinking about the
browser, not the game. (The browser has significantly higher popcon
scores and is used by many more people than the game.) So when they do
sudo aptitude install epiphany
7 matches
Mail list logo
