On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 06:51 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Mirco, > > just for the record, blam has been updated and does not depend on > gecko-sharp anymore.
thats good > As you don't intend to invest anymore time into > gecko-sharp (which is understandable), please request the removal of the > package. I already discussed it briefly with you and you agreed on this. > As we are nearing the etch release, this would mean two RC bugs less. I asked RM already and RC bugs of packages that are not in testing or tagged sid-only are not considered for the etch release. I will file the removal request, don't worry, but it usually takes anyhow months till they are processed ;) -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
