Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
See http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=592&group_id=106
This problem is known and fixed upstream in the 1.40 beta series of
pdftex, but it would be nice to have this small fix in etch (if
possible); se
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2005.dfsg.2-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> See http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=592&group_id=106
>
> This problem is known and fixed upstream in the 1.40 beta series of
> pdftex, but it wou
HI all!
Chris, thanks for reporting.
On Don, 19 Okt 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Fellow maintainers, what do you think - when should I upload this?
I upload texlive packages (bin, base, extra) today, and I have included
this fix. I only have to rebuild the bins ...
Best wishes
Norbert
On Mit, 18 Okt 2006, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> This problem is known and fixed upstream in the 1.40 beta series of
> pdftex, but it would be nice to have this small fix in etch (if
I am currently uploading texlive packages which should go into etch in
10 days. I checked the testcase and could compil
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fellow maintainers, what do you think - when should I upload this?
If the patch was approved by upstream, I'd say uploading soon is OK
(unless you have other fixes in mind for tetex-bin that you'd like to
group with that one...).
--
Florent
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Fellow maintainers, what do you think - when should I upload this?
>
> If the patch was approved by upstream, I'd say uploading soon is OK
> (unless you have other fixes in mind for tetex-bin that you'd like t
6 matches
Mail list logo