Hello, ...
Well, i gave this bug a bit of a test.
on a 2.6.18 powerpc/pegasos system, which is mostly etch with sid kernels, i
tested both proposed fixes :
if ! [ -r /proc/1/root -a /proc/1/root/ -ef /proc/self/root/ ]
returned FALSE in both cases (Well, i think i forgot the !, so it
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Followup-For: Bug #395889
Hi,
on a 2.6.18 powerpc/pegasos system, which is mostly etch with sid
kernels, i
tested both proposed fixes :
if ! [ -r /proc/1/root -a /proc/1/root/ -ef /proc/self/root/ ]
returned FALSE in both cases (Well, i think i forgot
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Followup-For: Bug #395889
I guess you already know it, but I think it should be in the bug log:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=116066318011633w=2
contains another way to detect a chroot.
Actually I find that way a little cumbersome. Plus, it will
severity 395889 serious
thanks
Hi,
actually, we will release with kernel 2.6.18. For this reason, we need
to have this bug fixed prior to release of Etch. In other words, this
bug is Release Critical in the sense that we cannot release before this
bug is resolved. So, I'm setting the severity to
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061107 11:10]:
actually, we will release with kernel 2.6.18. For this reason, we need
to have this bug fixed prior to release of Etch. In other words, this
bug is Release Critical in the sense that we cannot release before this
bug is resolved. So, I'm
Package: udev
Version: 0.100-2
Severity: grave
Justification: package is uninstallable
On kernels = 2.6.18 udev cannot be installed in a chroot anymore for the
following reasons:
- The check chrooted() does not work anymore, as explained, e.g., in
severity 395889 important
thanks
On Oct 28, Michael Tautschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On kernels = 2.6.18 udev cannot be installed in a chroot anymore for the
I know.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7 matches
Mail list logo
